3 Responses to “Samsung Transform Android Phone (Sprint)”

  1. Y. Nakai says:
    33 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
    4.0 out of 5 stars
    Decent mid-range Android phone, October 13, 2010
    By 
    Y. Nakai (New York, NY United States) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This review is from: Samsung Transform Android Phone (Sprint) (Wireless Phone)

    First, please note, this phone is NOT PINK. I don’t know what joker put that in the technical specifications above, but it is your standard black / grey / chrome phone.

    Before I purchased the Samsung Transform, I spent a good hour testing other Android QWERTY phones on Sprint – mostly the Epic 4G and the Intercept. While the Epic 4G was noticeably more responsive and had better screen contrast and more pixels, it is also significantly more expensive. The Intercept is slightly cheaper up front, but also feels a lot cheaper. So the Transform strikes a decent middle ground, and with the upcoming Froyo (Android 2.2) upgrade, the speed should improve significantly.

    This is my first Android phone, and I’m very pleased. The keyboard and other physical design elements are solid and well thought out. The battery life is decent for a smartphone, and the MicroUSB charging port makes it inexpensive and easy to share cords with your other devices. Since the operating system is almost pure stock Android (with the addition of Sprint ID, which I haven’t tested), it should be highly compatible and easy to modify. And the price is very reasonable.

    The only reason I give it 4 stars rather than 5 is that the software, Android 2.1, is not as responsive as it should be, and because every phone should have physical keys to answer and end calls. The softkeys below the screen, and on-screen keys, are too unresponsive and hard to use without looking. This is a common problem, but even the Samsung Intercept accomplishes this basic usability task, so Samsung should know better.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  2. S. Chung says:
    11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
    2.0 out of 5 stars
    Could be great, but is way too slow, December 16, 2010
    By 
    S. Chung (Bay Area, CA USA) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This review is from: Samsung Transform Android Phone (Sprint) (Wireless Phone)

    I’ve owned smart phones since 2000 – had a Kyocera 6035, Samsung i300, i500, and a few generations of Palm Treo’s, so I have some preconceived notions on what to expect from a smartphone. This is my first Android phone, and based on the specs it should be a great phone. Compared to the higher end Samsung Galaxy S Android phones, this pretty much has it all except for a few key differences:

    1. slower 800 MHz processor (vs 1000 MHz)
    2. smaller RAM size 256MB (vs 512MB)
    3. lower resolution 480×320 screen (vs 800×480)
    4. lower resolution 3.2 MP camera (vs 5MP)
    5. smaller 4.6″x2.4 face size (vs 4.9″x2.5″)
    6. older OS Android 2.1 (vs Android 2.2) as of 12/21/2010

    Besides being watered a down a little on specs, it pretty much has EVERYTHING else – full slide out keyboard, both front and rear cameras, LED camera flash, wifi, etc. If you look at the 6 things above, it is still pretty good – 800MHz isn’t much different from 1GHz, plus it consumes less power. 256MB seems enough to run all the apps I’ve tried. 480×320 is the same resolution as the iPhone 3G, and it still is pretty darn good. Using a tiny lens, pictures captured by the 3.2MP CCD aren’t much different in overall quality than ones captured with a 5MP CCD. The smaller form factor was a big plus for me (same size as an iPhone, just a little thicker to accommodate the slide-out keyboard) since the Galaxy S phones feel too bulky in my pocket. This phone also costs a lot less, and with Sprint it doesn’t carry that idiotic $10 monthly add-on fee for the “privilege of owning a higher end phone”. So why isn’t this a 5-star phone!? Well, mainly because of item #6 – the older Android 2.1 OS runs the UI (user interface) so slowly, with so much lag, that it’s almost unusable, at least from the point of view of the “power user” who wants to get things done quickly without much fuss.

    On my phone it is common to see lag times in the 3-5 second range after tapping on something on the screen before the phone responds. Often the phone is too slow to track the movement of finger swipes across the screen properly so if you are trying enlarge a web page, answer the phone, turn on speaker phone, etc., you often have to try 2-3 times to get it to work. Also lots of “native” apps that you can download from the Android market are actually built as web pages that run off the built-in webkit engine, and they use a lot of javascript. Well, the experience with those apps isn’t great, javascript is agonizingly slow.

    In addition to the UI performance, there are a few design oversights which may or may not be an issue for other users. The biggest one for me is the lack of an LED indicator to tell you when there is something pending. So to check if you missed a call or if you have a new text, you have to turn on the screen, authenticate (which I have to do slowly so the phone can keep up with my finger movements), and pull down the status bar, and unless there is something pending you did it for nothing. In contrast my old smart phones used to just flash an LED which meant “you need to check something”, so you could tell whether or not you needed to turn the screen on at all. Another peeve is that answering/hanging up a call is done via “swiping” your finger across the screen (i.e., with software) as opposed to having a hardware button to push, which means I have to be looking at my phone whenever I answer or silence a call – I can’t just reach into my pocket and push a button. Finally, the battery life isn’t very good, and it charges slowly (~2 hours). I have to charge my phone every day, and keep a charger in the car to make sure I don’t run out of juice, but I suspected this would be the case before I bought the phone based on reviews of other Android phones.

    Based on the performance improvements featured in the Android 2.2 release (just-in-time compilation, V8 javascript engine) and the reports of users with other Android phones that saw a remarkable difference when they upgraded to 2.2, I would speculate that this would be a great midrange phone if/when Samsung finally releases an upgrade to Android 2.2. They promised a release by the end of the year, and it’s 12/21 and still nothing, so it’s quite possible they decided to focus their resources elsewhere and we may never see Android 2.2 on this phone. Most likely their folks are working on getting the new Android 2.3 working on their higher end phones first. So, until Samsung releases Android 2.2 for this phone, I would recommend you stick with a different phone that already has Android 2.2+ on it.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  3. Pinkeee says:
    7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
    4.0 out of 5 stars
    Like it!, November 20, 2010
    By 
    Pinkeee
    This review is from: Samsung Transform Android Phone (Sprint) (Wireless Phone)

    Coming from a Pixi on Sprint, so this is an upgrade for me. Personally, I love this phone. Add Advanced Task Killer to get rid of things running in the background and save battery. Add Home Switcher and Launcher Pro to get all kinds of great things, including getting rid of that D Sprint ID button and landscape on home page, etc. Sprint ID is pretty lame, but I can see some reasons for it, such as having work ID and personal ID.

    I have to have slider keyboard and I actually have small hands. Works great for me. Can’t type on a screen- too many mistakes.

    According to Sprint, they will be updating to 2.2 Android before end of year. Hopefully that’ll add more punch to the phone.

    Android is great!! The more you play with it, the more you grow to see why it is wonderful!

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

Leave a Reply